Skip to main content
Log in

Plant colonization after complete and partial removal of disturbed soils for wetland restoration of former agricultural fields in Everglades National Park

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Hole-in-the-Donut is a 4000-ha region of former farmlands within Everglades National Park that is dominated by a monoculture of the non-indigenous pest plantSchinus terebinthifolius (Brazilian pepper). Prior to extensive farming in the region, the area consisted of short hydroperiod graminoid wetlands and mesic pine savannah. Rock plowing in preparation of these lands for farming created an artificial soil layer that broke up the limestone substrate, mixed and aerated the native marl soil layer with the broken limestone, and elevated the surface slightly. Farming practices also included the use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides. The modified soil substrate quickly became dominated byS. terebinthifolius when farming ceased in 1975, despite efforts to control its establishment, such as prescribed fire, herbicide treatment, and mowing. Preliminary evidence indicated that soil removal would prevent re-invasion byS. terebinthifolius and could lead to colonization by native wetlands plants. Two trials, a partial soil removal (PSR) and a compete soil removal (CSR), were performed on a pilot test site beginning in 1989 to determine whether all or only a portion of this modified soil substrate needed to be removed to attain desired results. Removal of rock-plowed surface material lowered elevation in both treatments. While the PSR treatment did show an increase in the number and coverage of hydrophytes for a few years, it did not prohibit re-colonization and re-establishment of a canopy ofS. terebinthifolius, and by 1996, the site was again dominated by a monoculture ofS. terebinthifolius. By contrast, the CSR treatment showed rapid colonization by hydrophytes and no successful re-colonization byS. terebinthifolius. Lowering elevations by 15 to 45 cm allowed for longer periods of flooding and rapid colonization by hydrophytes on both sites. After the sites were cleared, the average difference in elevation between the two treatment areas was less than a tenth of a meter, but this resulted in a slightly shorter hydroperiod on the PSR site. The small amount of residual rock-plowed soil with high levels of nutrients, along with its slightly shorter hydroperiod on the PSR site, appear to have contributed significantly to the success ofS. terebinthifolius in re-colonizing this treatment area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Armentano, T. V., R. F. Doren, W. J. Platt, and T. Mullins. 1995. Effects of Hurricane Andrew on coastal and interior forests of southern Florida: overview and synthesis. Journal of Coastal Research 21:111–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazzaz, F. A. 1996. Plants in Changing Environments. Gambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briske, D. D. and J. D. Derner. 1998. Clonal biology of caespitose grasses. p. 106–135.In G. P. Cheplick (ed.) Population Biology of Grasses. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colinvaux, P. 1986. Ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correll, D. S. and H. B. Correll. 1982. Flora of the Bahama Archipelago. Lubrecht Cramer Limited, Port Jervis, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple, N. K., G. H. Dalrymple, and K. A. Fanning. 1993. On the vegetation of restored and unrestored rock-plowed wetlands of the East Everglades of southern Florida. Restoration Ecology 1:220–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derner, J. D., D. D. Briske, and T. W. Boutton. 1997. Does grazing mediate soil carbon and nitrogen accumulation beneath C4 perennial grasses along an environmental gradient? Plant and Soil 191: 147–156.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doren, R. F. and L. D. Whiteaker. 1988. Proposal for mitigation and monitoring of secondary successional communities in ENP: Hole-in-the-Donut. Everglades National Park. Homestead, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doren, R. F. and L. D. Whiteaker 1990a. Comparison of economic feasibility of chemical control strategies on differing age and density classes ofSchinus terebinthifolius. Natural Areas Journal 10: 28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doren, R. F. and L. D. Whiteaker. 1990b. Effects of fire on different size individuals ofSchinus terebinthifolius. Natural Areas Journal 10:106–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doren, R. F., L. D. Whiteaker, G. Molnar, and D. Sylvia. 1990. Restoration of former wetlands within the Hole-in-the-Donut in ENP. p. 33–50.In F. J. Webb, Jr. (ed.) Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Conference on Wetland Restorations and Creation. Hillsborough Community College, Plant City, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewel, J. J. 1986. Invasibility: lessons from south Florida. p. 214–230.In A. H. Mooney and J. J. Drake (eds.) Ecology of Biological Invasions of North America and Hawaii. Springer Verlag, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewel, J. J., D. S. Ojima, D. A. Karl, and W. F. Debusk. 1982.Schinus in successional ecosystems of Everglades National Park. South Florida Research Center, Everglades National Park, Homestead, FL, USA. Technical Report T-676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H. G., Jr. 1982. Multivariate Analysis in Community Ecology. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, R. K. and J. W. Wooten. 1981. Aquatic and Wetland Plants of Southeastern United States: Dicotyledons. University of Georgia Press, Athens, GA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, K. L. 1987. Mechanisms of colonization and species persistence in plant communities. p. 173–188.In W. R. Jordan, M. E. Gilpin, and J. D. Aber (eds.) Restoration Ecology: a Synthetic Approach to Ecological Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent, M. and P. Coker. 1994. Vegetational Description and Analysis. Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, P. 1987. Old field succession in Everglades National Park. South Florida Research Center Report, Everglades National Park, Homestead, FL, USA. Technical Report SFRC-87/03.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. and M. Norland. 2001. The role of soil fertility in invasion of Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) in Everglades National Park, Florida. Soil Science 166:400–405.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Long, W. L. and O. Lakela. 1971. A Flora of Tropical Florida. University of Miami Press, Coral Gables, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loope, L. L. and V. L. Dunevitz. 1981. Investigations of early plant succession on abandoned farmland in Everglades National Park. South Florida Research Center, Everglades National Park, Homestead, FL, USA. Fechnical Report T-644.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. M. and E. O. Wilson. 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press. Princeton, NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller-Dombois, D. and H. Ellenberg. 1974. Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olmsted, I. and L. L. Loope. 1984. Plant communities in Everglades National Park. p. 167–184.In P. J. Gleason (ed.) Environments of South Florida Present and Past II. Miami Geological Society, Miami, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orth, P. G. 1981. Fertility management of Dade County soils. Soil Crop Science Society Florida Proceedings 40:1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orth, P. G. and R. A. Conover. 1975. Changes in nutrients resulting from farming the Hole-in-the-Donut, Everglades National Park. Proceedings of Florida State Horticultural Society 28:221–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielou, E. C. 1984. The Interpretation of Ecological Data. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, P. B., Jr. 1988. National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Southeast Region (Region 2). National Wetlands Inventory, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. Biological Report 88(26.2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. and F. J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry. W. H. Freeman, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • StatSoft. 1994. Statistica for Windows. StatSoft, Inc. Tulsa, OK. USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward, K. K. and W. H. Ornes. 1975. The autecology of sawgrass in the Florida Everglades. Ecology 56:162–171.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D. 1988. Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. H. 1975. Communities and Ecosystems, second edition. MacMillan, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlin, R. P. 1998. Guide to the Vascular Plants of Florida. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J. H. 1996. Biostatistical Analysis, third edition. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dalrymple, G.H., Doren, R.F., O'Hare, N.K. et al. Plant colonization after complete and partial removal of disturbed soils for wetland restoration of former agricultural fields in Everglades National Park. Wetlands 23, 1015–1029 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2003)023[1015:PCACAP]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2003)023[1015:PCACAP]2.0.CO;2

Key words

Navigation